Message-ID: <31637252.1075841537772.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 23:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: chris.foster@enron.com
To: mike.swerzbin@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com, matt.motley@enron.com, 
	robert.badeer@enron.com, sean.crandall@enron.com, 
	diana.scholtes@enron.com, jeff.richter@enron.com, 
	chris.mallory@enron.com, tom.alonso@enron.com, 
	mark.fischer@enron.com, john.malowney@enron.com, paul.choi@enron.com, 
	stewart.rosman@enron.com, holli.krebs@enron.com, 
	stanley.cocke@enron.com, greg.wolfe@enron.com, 
	lester.rawson@enron.com, anna.mehrer@enron.com, 
	michael.driscoll@enron.com, holden.salisbury@enron.com
Subject: April 24th Meeting Re: Methodology for Orig. Tracking
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Chris H Foster <Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT>
X-To: Mike Swerzbin <Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT>, Tim Belden <Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT>, Matt Motley <Matt Motley/PDX/ECT@ECT>, Robert Badeer <Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT>, Sean Crandall <Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT>, Diana Scholtes <Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT>, Jeff Richter <Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT>, Chris Mallory <Chris Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT>, Tom Alonso <Tom Alonso/PDX/ECT@ECT>, Mark Fischer <Mark Fischer/PDX/ECT@ECT>, John Malowney <John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT>, Paul Choi <Paul Choi/SF/ECT@ECT>, Stewart Rosman <Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT>, Holli Krebs <Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT>, Stanley Cocke <Stanley Cocke/PDX/ECT@ECT>, Greg Wolfe <Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT>, Lester Rawson <Lester Rawson/PDX/ECT@ECT>, Anna Mehrer <Anna Mehrer/PDX/ECT@ECT>, Michael M Driscoll <Michael M Driscoll/PDX/ECT@ECT>, Holden Salisbury <Holden Salisbury/PDX/ECT@ECT>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Salisbury, Holden\Read
X-Origin: SALISBURY-H
X-FileName: holden salisbury 6-26-02.PST

Per Tim's request, we are going to have a meeting on Tuesday April 24th, after the fundies meeting, intended to be a forum to discuss the "Orig Issue."  You all have the handout outlining the various options (it is also attached).  The method that seems to make the most sense to everyone so far is the Current Method, combined with a more formal Performance Review Process whereby Traders will evaluate Middle Marketers and Vice Versa.   Please reveiw the options and be prepared to weigh in with any proposed changes in this approach.  Our hope is that the meeting results in a consensus on what method we will use so we can move on as best we can given the inherent difficulties in addressing the issue to everyone's satisfaction.   

Thanks!

Chris

 