Message-ID: <15468267.1075842275223.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 02:31:00 -0800 (PST)
From: dan.hyvl@enron.com
To: ellen.wallumrod@enron.com
Subject: Re: New Deals
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Dan J Hyvl
X-To: Ellen Wallumrod
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Dan_Hyvl_Dec2000_June2001\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: HYVL-D
X-FileName: dhyvl.nsf

Ellen,
 With this added information, can you generate the contemplated confirmation?
----- Forwarded by Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 10:29 AM -----

	Janet H Wallis
	12/12/2000 09:57 AM
		
		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: New Deals

Forget the greenhouse requirements and  just make it requirements up to 50 
MMbtu a day.  The meter number is #1598.  
Also, the GTC method is fine with me.

Thanks,
J



Dan J Hyvl
12/12/2000 09:44 AM
To: Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T 
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Re: New Deals  

Janet,
 Two items regarding the Panther deal.   What is meant by "Greenhouse 
requirements"?  New delivery point, can be get a better description about 
this point, is it currently in existence, if so, how was it put in, who was 
the deal maker for the installation, etc.  After this information is 
provided, I see no reason why this shouldn't be documented by the confirm 
desk using a standard    GTC confirm.  



	Janet H Wallis
	12/12/2000 09:17 AM
		 
		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: New Deals

Panther



I will send the Entex deal later, thanks.

Janet




