Message-ID: <18920334.1075845010984.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 03:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: mark.haedicke@enron.com
To: julia.murray@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com, deb.korkmas@enron.com, 
	jeffrey.hodge@enron.com, alan.aronowitz@enron.com, 
	sheila.tweed@enron.com
Subject: Appointments of Agents and Attorneys in Fact
Cc: david.delainey@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: david.delainey@enron.com
X-From: Mark E Haedicke
X-To: Julia Murray, Mark Taylor, Deb Korkmas, Jeffrey T Hodge, Alan Aronowitz, Sheila Tweed
X-cc: David W Delainey
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Mark_Haedicke_Oct2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: HAEDICKE-M
X-FileName: mhaedic.nsf

I would like to do fewer resolutions authorizing non-vps to sign contracts, 
and when we need such authorizations, let's make sure the resolutions are 
appropriately limited.  My thoughts are as follows:

1.   We have a lot of vps that can sign contracts.
2.   It is generally ok to have confirmations signed by certain carefully 
selected directors since we are confirming a trade that already took place 
and there is master agreement already signed.
3.   There are certain very routine agreements like pipeline right-of-way 
agreements that are ok for carefully selected directors to sign.
4.   Confidentiality agreements should be signed by a vp.
5.   Any authorization for a director to sign should expire within not more 
than one year and revoke all prior authorizations.

Please give me your comments.

Mark   