Message-ID: <26714324.1075842565841.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 02:17:00 -0800 (PST)
From: drew.fossum@enron.com
To: susan.scott@enron.com
Subject: Re: Reply comments
Cc: mary.miller@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bcc: mary.miller@enron.com
X-From: Drew Fossum
X-To: Susan Scott
X-cc: Mary Kay Miller
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Drew_Fossum_Dec2000_June2001_2\Notes Folders\'sent mail
X-Origin: FOSSUM-D
X-FileName: dfossum.nsf

Very artful--I think this resolves MKM's concern but I'll defer to her on=
=20
that.  This approach does also give us more commercial flexibility which I=
=20
think the marketers should like.  df


From: Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/23/2001 10:04 AM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: =20

Subject: Reply comments

Mary Kay, here is my proposed "fix" for paragraph 1 b.  ...running it by yo=
u=20
just to make sure I understood your message correctly.  Let me know if this=
=20
is OK.

Calpine has also requested that the tariff be amended to clarify that=20
capacity remains generally available during the notice period but not durin=
g=20
the option bidding process.  However, it was not Transwestern=01,s intent t=
o so=20
limit the availability of recourse service.  Recourse shippers may request=
=20
and obtain posted capacity at any time, including during the option bidding=
=20
process, unless and until an option is sold on that capacity.  If this is n=
ot=20
clear in Transwestern=01,s proposed tariff provisions, Transwestern will mo=
dify=20
the tariff sheets accordingly. =20


