Message-ID: <21751659.1075842518477.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 06:01:00 -0800 (PST)
From: drew.fossum@enron.com
To: susan.scott@enron.com
Subject: TW RP99-335
Cc: mary.miller@enron.com, bill.cordes@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: mary.miller@enron.com, bill.cordes@enron.com
X-From: Drew Fossum
X-To: Susan Scott
X-cc: Mary Kay Miller, Bill Cordes
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Drew_Fossum_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\'sent mail
X-Origin: FOSSUM-D
X-FileName: dfossum.nsf

I have no great interest in appealing the FERC order denying rehearing.  This 
one is a loser as it was decided on TW-specific facts and I see no clear 
inconsistency between FERC's various orders on revenue sharing.   Unless 
someone feels strongly to the contrary, lets punt.  Thanks. DF 