Message-ID: <24735331.1075863331610.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 20:27:00 -0800 (PST)
From: drew.fossum@enron.com
To: mary.miller@enron.com
Subject: Re: Mavrix
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Drew Fossum
X-To: Mary Kay Miller <Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \DFOSSUM (Non-Privileged)\Fossum, Drew\'Sent Mail
X-Origin: Fossum-D
X-FileName: DFOSSUM (Non-Privileged).pst

I haven't seen a contract yet on the original 33,000 on TW but Susan thought the deal was going to be done--she's checking to see where the holdup is.  On the El Paso capacity, Mavrix never submitted a bid.  I think the deadline got past us before we were ready.  df    


   

	  From:  Mary Kay Miller                           03/05/2001 05:28 PM	
		


To:	Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	 

Subject:	Re: Mavrix   

What is the latest on this?  Did they bid on El Paso?  MK



Drew Fossum
02/09/2001 05:30 PM
To:	Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/Enron@EnronXGate 

Subject:	Mavrix

Three to-dos on our Mavrix meeting:
1.  Follow up and make sure the officers get set up correctly.
2.  Talk to Perry Frazier in planning--he is keeping copies of the actual EBB postings showing that we have had the Ignacio-Thoreau piece of capacity posted (the 33,000/d).  I'd like you to keep copies of those postings in your file until Mavrix actually buys that capacity.  If we end up in a fight at some time, we'll be able to prove the postings were out there, because the actual postings are not electronically archived, I am told.
3. All Mavrix deals will need initials from legal--probably you, Susan.  For now, please let me know of any deals Mavrix does with non-Enron pipes.  For Enron pipes, of course, contract approval will be via our ordinary procedures and MKM's group and I should be advised as a matter of course.  

Thanks.  DF 







<Embedded StdOleLink>