Message-ID: <22737028.1075863329139.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:48:00 -0800 (PST)
From: drew.fossum@enron.com
To: mary.miller@enron.com
Subject: Re: Red Rock posting
Cc: susan.scott@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: susan.scott@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com
X-From: Drew Fossum
X-To: Mary Kay Miller <Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON>
X-cc: Susan Scott <Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate>, Steven Harris <Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \DFOSSUM (Non-Privileged)\Fossum, Drew\'Sent Mail
X-Origin: Fossum-D
X-FileName: DFOSSUM (Non-Privileged).pst

I think we do say that in the "to the extent we didn't get binding bids for all of the capacity" sentence.  With that clarification, I think we ought to get this posted and the letters out to shippers.  Susan--make it so.  Thanks.  df  


   

	  From:  Mary Kay Miller                           03/26/2001 05:35 PM	
		


To:	Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON 

Subject:	Re: Red Rock posting   

As revised is ok, letter also,  but shouldn't we refer to the fact we didn't get binding bids, since we are way beyond March 2nd?  MK


   

	  From:  Drew Fossum                           03/26/2001 01:39 PM	
		


To:	Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:	Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON 

Subject:	Re: Red Rock posting   

Here are my comments--I'd like to take out the stuff about the rate and any implication that we have flexible terms and conditions.  DF


 


From:	Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/26/2001 08:45 AM
To:	Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:	 

Subject:	Red Rock posting

Please see the attached and let me know your comments as soon as possible.
 










<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>