FREE ENERGY -- E<E>E -- "The formula of everything" - Mn. Elia Kosiński, Imanuel Alex Nowicki

Introduction

Theory of everything E<E>E (Perpetuum Mobile & Free Energy).

E<E>E The formula of everything - The pattern of life.

Artificial intelligence (AI) chat: Mn. Elia, is it able to create a perpetuum mobile? Can it provide the Free Energy it basically needs most for its own power...

In your opinion, will artificial intelligence create free energy?

Attention, the book is not a guide, much less something like "do it yourself".

The author only logically analyses the materials he found in books and on the so - called web, i.e. publicly available information.

The logical analysis is true, as all components of this analysis are true. The author does not check whether the ingredients are real, he only believes the word of the world and its truth.

E - book and printed book differ in materials and photos. A printed book has more pictures and a certificate, and usually has more text.

The e - book is a stripped - down version without pictures; photos and drawings are available only in the printed version.

I would like to share my impressions about the second book of an extraordinary author, a seeker of scientific puzzles, Imanuel. This is his second book in the Free Energy series.

By reading this position, we gain a consultation, and in fact a thorough analysis of free energy. The only price of such a consultation is the cost of the book itself, so it's really worth getting acquainted with it, especially nowadays.

I read the first of the two parts to find out if it's true that Free Energy can be created based on Imanuel's Theory of Everything. And I have to admit that the theme did not disappoint me, on the contrary. However, in his first book in this series, I became more familiar with the topic of "perpetuum mobile".

One more important thing: to understand the world from Imanuel's perspective, you need to put some effort into it. His style may not be perfect, but has anyone knows the theory of everything like him? I think that in this case you can skip the sophisticated style and hard spelling rules, it's not the most important thing. Now you have to breathe life into his work, help him improve it, because at the moment each of his books is basically still a draft, the first approach to the subject.

His first work "Atlantis Illusion" convinces us that time has been defeated, and yet Imanuel does not fully reveal the details and only in the second part does he reveal to us the secrets of time and talk about its true nature.

"The Theory of Everything According to Imanuel" is another book in the author's second publication, where he delves into the subject of creating something out of nothing.

But enough descriptions, back to the analysis of the book "The ark of time".

Free Energy on the Internet

Imanuel, as befits a true researcher, combines different engines. I also found a similar issue on the web and in principle it is not new, the world has been dealing with this topic for a long time. I would even say that from antiquity. But let's go back to our time. There is a lot of information on the Internet about this - experimenters combine motors with an alternator, with a generator or with a dynamo and try to obtain additional energy. As a result of their actions, there is a certain excess of energy visible on the appropriate meters, and everything is nicely recorded and described.

Of course, our device consumes energy, but we try to generate and harvest more energy than we consume. So that, it would always be a plus. So if, for example, a generator generates energy, that's great. Even when it produces relatively little, it is already a good step towards Free Energy.

Someone may still laugh at it, but others are most impressed, including me. Many people discuss this topic and ask if it is true or false.

In a word, there are many supporters and opponents of this method. I think this topic should be thoroughly analysed and summarized once and for all.

From a strictly scientific point of view, this contradicts the principle of conservation of energy, which cannot be created from nothing, nor can it be annihilated, it can only change its form.

But from a logical point of view, if the alternator, generator or generator has a power of 10 kW, and the engine that drives it has 2 kW, then we obtain excess energy that only needs to be extracted. Example: 10 kW minus 2 kW equals an excess of 8 kW. And it's logical, I'd even say its pure math, so where is the error here? Why do so many videos send the message that it all works without power? As a result, there is unnecessary confusion and lots of negative comments that it is a scam. Where is the truth? I think that the one who tried and combined these different devices deserves to like his film. For the very willingness to experiment, for the effort, for devoting your time to create such a film and combine the work of various devices, and then present the effects to a wide audience.

I will definitely check it personally and share my knowledge on the subject, and then I will ask for comments and honest statements: what do you think about it and whether these films are really valuable. However, I already believe that today's world is begging for this kind of experiments and their thorough analysis.

Using alternators and generators we encounter many problems. Usually. However, they can and must be overcome. In general, this topic is very popular nowadays, so I'm glad that I also found it in Imanuel's book "The ark of time" (abbreviated "Taot"). It's basically a similar idea, and the very idea and content of this book ("Taot") was created a long time ago, before the Internet. So let's find out what this book is about.

However, first one can ask the question of why most of the world rejects this idea without checking or even thinking, many deny it, writing and saying that it is against all rules. That's the way it is with many ideas and concept, but I'm not one of those people.

Of course, I'm not an electrician, I know that everyone should do what they can, but you can always consult a professional and act calmly under his guidance. Analysing the topic logically, I may not avoid mistakes, which other readers will probably immediately discover. However, the relevant experts will probably tell you whether this experiment will work or not. And this will be my own logical analysis and I don't assume at all that Imanuel is 100% right, maybe he is wrong. But I will check everything very carefully.

The author mercilessly starts with the possibility of obtaining 6000 Watt. I assume that a powerful generator with great power should be used for this.

But in our time, it is a 20 cm by 20 cm generator. Imanuel converts the work into hours. To obtain 6000 watts per hour, we only need 100 watts per second. And our task is to accumulate this energy in batteries.

In my opinion, 6000 Watts per hour is an impressive result. In their YouTube videos, people achieve - they produce 50 Watts per second. If we can accumulate such potential in the battery, it is possible to obtain 3000 Watts in a minute. Imanuel notes that a generator or alternator generates energy, yes, but it is very important to collect or store this energy. Of course, the fact is that somewhere on the web people who can get 6000 Watts per second are promoting themselves. I immediately count how much energy I could then obtain in an hour, because I know that such free energy aggregates can already be purchased from enthusiasts. I don't know yet whether it works or not in practice, but I will definitely check it out, because the results are reportedly impressive. In Imanuel's book there are smaller numbers, because the author used a traditional generator, so it's just a combination of two engines and therefore the results are not as spectacular as the others. But as real as possible.

That's more or less how I understood it, but now we'll see what the author himself thinks about it.

Imanuel is a man open to change, he deals with logical analyzes and his idea is absolutely logical, although it may contain minor errors or limitations. This is what happens at the beginning of every experiment. That is why I think that the knowledge of a good electrician should be used as much as possible, who will organize and explain everything well.

Master and Apprentice

Time - a few years before the Atlantis reunion.

(dialogue between the master and his student, in this case a student with a graceful name - Paulina).

- Master, when we get the energy from our machines, we'll have one percent of the excess power left, - the curious girl says.

- Paulina, each machine is designed to generate more power than it needs, - replies the sage.

- Well, following this lead, let's assume that we have a machine that produces 2.1 kW, and we need power to drive 2 kW. I understand that we will create a closed system, and then this machine will drive itself?

The master fell into a great reverie, only after a while he replied: - Paulinka, we will try. Can we call this machine something? I propose a working name, it will be perpetuum mobile. What do you think?

- I like. But isn't that too heavy a topic? - the girl asked.

- My dear, we can consider the subject of perpetuum mobile from many aspects and levels. But basically the main thread is movement, and movement is energy. We have many possibilities of movement and this does not prevent the perpetuum mobile from working all the time. Because movement is energy, in general.

- One explorer, Imanuel, says that we scientists don't explore topics properly, we take shortcuts and create hypotheses.

- Yes, we shorten everything, I noticed that a long time ago. Once, the photon was analyzed as an eternal engine, because scientists assumed that the photon should be enclosed in fiber optics, that then it does not lose energy and even generates it. - The master thought.

- So basically everything is based on energy? - A slight smile appeared on Pauline's face.

- If we assume that we want to get from point A to point B, our perpetual motion machine should be looped so that it works non - stop, and the photon is perfect for this, - explained the scientist.

- So a photon satisfies all the requirements of a perpetual motion machine, because logically, if there were a photon, it would be in motion all the time.

- Yes, if we consider a photon as energy, we won't, because the photon exhausts its energy as it travels and degrades as an object, - explained the old master.

- Movement is a kind of energy. Imanuel claims that instead of a photon, the possibilities of a particle called an Energoton must be used, because a photon, as you said, loses energy and disappears, and therefore it is impossible to create a perpetuum mobile from a photon.

- Imanuel is carefully analyzing the behavior of the Energoton, he believes that this particle contains something like atomic fusion within itself, of course, considered on an atomic scale, - replied the learned old man.

- Oh yes! Continuing on this track, this energy eventually burns out, but much later, - the girl agreed.

- Yes, basically yes. Because indeed, to create movement we need energy. This is obvious to everyone, even to laymen.

- But a perpetual motion machine is in constant motion. So he's constantly in need of energy, isn't he, Master? - Pauline smiled slightly again.

- Yes, but there are so many types of energy and so many possibilities to use it ... just a lot. This world also has many types of matter that are perfectly suited for this purpose. Let's take ordinary water for example - it is able to travel from point A to point B with minimal energy loss. Only again, it will definitely need the energy of motion. And here, even a slight slope of the terrain is enough (after all, this is the energy to be used), it is enough to properly set and maintain such a structure. The construction is, as it were, an energy multiplier. We'll get to that in a moment. I'll explain everything to you in more detail. We have a couple of issues here that need to be resolved. Remember that a photon is basically a particle that can travel from one point to another without any loss of energy, which is basically against science. - The master breathed a sigh of relief after so much deduction.

- Master, we need energy also for movement and at the same time for the structure itself? - Pauline inquired.

- Yes, of course, I confirm. But there is also a loss of something like the energy of an object, and we also have objects that lose their energy quickly. There are certainly also long - lived objects. As if not to guess, someday every object will disappear, our water will evaporate and the perpetual motion machine will stop. In fact, there is nothing that will stay forever, because the object is also energy, which consists of atoms. And suppose your machine runs for a million years and then disappears. How can you prove that she could keep working? Your example machine runs Nano millimeters and then a million years pass. Your object loses the precisely set Nano millimeters and the machine stops. In our universe there is nothing that will stay forever and therefore we will not build a perpetual motion engine based on the matter of this world. Despite this, people expect a miracle. And even if an almost perfect machine is invented, everyone criticizes it anyway, because they expect a perfect creation, which, as I said earlier, is impossible in practice.

We can consider the machine from different levels: friction, impact in one place ... and this leads to changes in matter, and then to changes in the machine itself, which results in stopping it, sooner or later. The only thing that can be built is only a long - lived engine, a machine that will run for a very, very long time, but will surely stop someday. Let's not be shy.

After such a long argument, the teacher took a deep breath and took a sip of water.

- So we won't be able to build a perpetual motion machine based on matter, I understand, - sighed the girl.