Introduction
At the very beginning of this publication, I would like to clarify that this will be a book mainly about preserving and improving the condition of the mind and life of a person using Quantum Tools, primarily the Philosopher's Stone Algorithm, of which I am the author. Of course, you can also use other Tools in this regard, but due to the fact that I am accustomed to the Algorithm and personally consider it the best Tool ever invented, so, I use it, as it were, automatically. These technical Tools like Quantic or Healy - probably others will be created soon - are expensive and you have to have a big enough budget for it, though. I know, I know, sick people are selling out to buy themselves similar modern devices, but still, for now, I think that "my" Philosopher's Stone Algorithm is the best. Only it requires commitment and time. Someone who doesn't want to delve into the theory of how these Quantum Tools work and has the cash to do so, will probably choose to buy a technical quantum device of the Quantec or Healy type, or something else, which, I predict, will be created in the near future, and will have the problem over with, will be able to just passively enjoy the benefits of Quantum Tools and the whole theory, and go about their own business.
However, in order to focus on the substance of this topic, I must refer here to the theory of esoPhysics and the Two Level Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (quantum's), which I have been promoting in my books. However, from now on they will call it the Theistic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. However, in order for someone to learn more deeply about the subject, I would recommend reading the contents of my previous publications. These books were written several times and they are: "esoPhysics", "The Uber Mage", "The Quantum Condition of the Mind", "The Four Pillars" and "Mind and esoPhysics". You don't have to buy them right away, as most are on offer from Legimi and Empik Go rental services.
Here I must refer to this theory to justify my view of the nature of the human psyche and consciousness, in the context of the possible intervention of this positive and "repair" it. That is, the proper correction of the psyche, human behavior and everything that affects us humans in life. Normally, after all, we live so godly, that is, so without deep reflection and attention to how these turns of life sculpt us, or rather our brains. And yet, as it happens in life, some are more fortunate others less fortunate (at least it seems so to us from the perspective of the Measurable Level, but in reality ...?!). Thus, our psyches, consciousnesses and even our souls can be corrected with the help of Quantum Tools. Someone will say: but after all, this is the content of our Path of Spiritual Development, it is inscribed in the meaning of our existence here on Earth. And yes and no. Indeed, until now there were no effective methods to interfere with this, but today in the Quantum Age there are finally the right Quantum Tools to face this subject. And there is also already a relevant theory, which, let me say here, I have mostly developed myself, possibly unearthed, and which people have long since discovered, only this deluge of Atheism, Materialism that has taken over Science and the official narrative has pushed this out of the public domain. Now, I'll state at the outset what I'm going to try to demonstrate before I move on to the proper forms of Cognitive Prosthesis, which makes it possible to interfere with the quality of our lives. So, first of all, I will demonstrate that the world is based on two levels. On the Measurable Level, that of Hard Matter, and on the other, the Non-Measurable Level, the level of Transcendence, the Spiritual Level. Then I will prove that on the Non-Measurable Level the Causal and Purposeful Cause, which I call God, must manifest, and which is already sufficient for all the Effects it causes, and which Effects are already manifested on the Measurable Level. I will show that God has given humans the attribute of influencing this Non-Measurable Level, which is the proper base of Causal and Purposeful Causes, the Effects of which manifest later on the Measurable Level, the one that can be subjected to measurement. At this level (the Non-Measurable Level), as I will also show, there is no randomness. I will need this to show that man, as an entity that functions on the Measurable Level, has this material body and material brain, must, like any entity, also be linked to this Non-Measurable Level, because, after all, everything must have a link to it, to this Non-Measurable Level. And related to what? The Soul, which is the manifestation of a person's Spirit from the Non-Measurable Level to this very Measurable Level. There is sufficient empirical evidence to claim that man's brain, through superposition, contains this material part, related to the Measurable Level, this Animality, and has a Soul, an expression of his Spirit, which is perceived by the brain, probably, as the Occultists claim, through the pineal gland, but this is not even important through what we perceive our Soul in the brain, because the Soul is certainly not a product of the work of the neurons in the brain. What is important is that this end result of this superposition of the Spiritual and the Animal is human consciousness. Human consciousness cannot be explained by a mere neural structure and the structure of the brain and nervous system, although attempts to study and explain this go back more than a hundred and fifty years, and so far the phenomenon of human consciousness could not and still cannot be explained by materialistic and atheistic categories. So Descartes was right that there is in man a dualism of the Spiritual and the Material (Animalism). Next, I will show how it is possible, using Quantum Tools and according to this whole theory, to influence the brain and the quality of life of man, by what I called, perhaps erroneously, imprecisely Cognitive Prosthesis.
2 Quantum Mechanics vs. Classical Mechanics
The twentieth century brought, from the perspective of today, a real breakthrough. Behold, Classical Mechanics a and classical physics in general was written and formulated in the language of Determinism. That is, in other words, the Causes that initiate physical processes are sufficient and sufficient for the Effects that are realized. It can be written like this:
?Cause (Cause ?Effect).
And as we have already explained to each other, Causes here can be: Causal or Intentional.
And Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Mechanics in general, is already written from a different point, it is written not in the spirit of Determinism. So, in what, you ask? This will become strictly apparent later in the book. Now I can state rather enigmatically that from our sense perception (Measurable Level) it is fully Indeterministic.
Write it down like this:
?Cause (Effect ? Cause).
In other words, Causes (Causal or Purposeful) are, yes necessary, but they are also insufficient. Which should be understood to mean that even knowing from our level of observation the Causes, we cannot be sure of the Effects that will occur in this physical process. However, if an Effect has arisen, it is sufficient and unambiguously determines the Cause that caused it.
So the great unknown?
And yes and no. About this I will write, but for now it is important to emphasize that this is so from the level of our observation, from the sensory level (Measurable Level). It turns out that, as I will explain and clarify later, there are two levels of the World. These first, is the Measurable Level, the level of hard matter, the level of the senses, but this second level, is the Unmeasurable Level. And this second level, the Unmeasurable Level is only considered in Quantum, or Quantum Mechanics and its further clones. This first level has always been considered from Aristotle to Einstein in classical physics, while this second level, the Unmeasurable Level, is the level that is inaccessible to our senses, our observations, our experiences. It is unrecorded by our ordinary five senses and by physical experiments and measuring apparatuses, which are, after all, extensions of our ordinary senses. And, most importantly, the processes that happen there at this level, although they are unmeasurable, beyond observation, manifest themselves later finally at the Measurable Level in the form of concrete and real (observed) Effects. So how does one know that such a level, this Unmeasurable Level exists, even must exist?
So let's first look at the mathematics (formalisms) used in classical physics and Quantum. It is commonly taught at a general level that we have several types of numbers. There are Natural numbers, Integer numbers, Measurable numbers and Non-Measurable numbers. Together, they constitute the entire set of Real numbers. However, it turns out that this is not entirely precise and exhaustive. Although these numbers, which I will now write about, were already known in part in antiquity, at least their existence was suspected, it was not until the Middle Ages that Italian mathematicians were able to convince themselves of their reality when they searched for general solutions of third-degree algebraic equations. So there is another type of numbers, which I intuitively in my publications called non-real, and which the Italian mathematician of the early Renaissance period Bombelli in his 1572 work Algebra Opera called non-real. That is, intuition from this point of view did not deceive me. Later, however, Descartes gave them, in my opinion, the misleading name of imaginary numbers, a name that has become widely accepted. What are these numbers? They are numbers, unlike Real numbers, numbers whose power two is negative. This is the distinguishing feature. That's why I quite intuitively called them non-real numbers, because with Real numbers the power of the second is always greater than or equal to zero. You will ask yourself, and what does this seem to give? What it gives is that the set of numbers containing both Real numbers and nonReal numbers algebraically closes the mathematical systems that contain them. That is, all algebraic (mathematical) equations and problems have solutions in this set, the solutions not escaping into some more general larger set of numbers. And, importantly, this is the smallest such numerical set. This would perhaps be just a mathematical curiosity, but I have arrived by way of considerations, if only even the problems I describe in my publications, that the Pythagorean Principle is correct and valid, that all true mathematical concepts and quantities have their reflection in phenomena and processes, and physical concepts. This is already the case. This is not an axiom seen intuitively by the path of inspiration, but by a circuitous route after painstaking deliberation, as it were, around from end to beginning, I came to this conclusion. Thus, from the point of view of physics, I can now, but with a certain advance, which I will justify later, say that the numerical set containing and Real numbers and non-real numbers constitutes the basic and underlying numerical spectrum when considering "all" physical processes. Such a smallest set is the set of Complex numbers.
z= a + ib, where a, b belong to the set of Real numbers, and i?=-1; z belongs to the set of Complex numbers.
Now I will state rather vaguely, which will be important later, however, that composite numbers are am measurable, actually unmeasurable. So all concepts, quantities and values represented by these numbers cannot be measured in real life. Do they not exist, then? However, it was one of several premises that led me to the division that the structure of our World cannot be one-level. There must be deeper structures. Let's call them the generalized Unmeasured Level. So the answer to this question is, yes they exist, but not on the ordinary Measurable Level, but on the Non-Measurable Level.
It turns out that it was only in the 20th century that Science, Physics, and more precisely Quantum Mechanics was the first branch of Physics to reach this second level of the World, the Unmeasurable Level. So for now, everything seems clear and logical (logically consistent). It's just that, actually, for what reasons, Science, physics does not register this, and from the beginning of the emergence of Quantum has not allowed it. The omnipresent Determinism, Physicalism and Atheism, prevailing in modern Science, rejects and has rejected any idea that there should be some level not accessible to our senses. Such ideas are immediately affixed with the patch of paranoia. This is still the aftermath of being enraptured by the Rationalism of the Enlightenment era, the power of the mind and man's independence from Nature. But, come to think of it, if there is indeed a generalized second level, called by me the Unmeasurable, does it not associate you, Reader, unequivocally with Spirituality, a deeper level of existence? Let's leave this aspect of Spirituality for now, let's focus on the scientific implications and effects of allowing the concept of the second level of reality, which arises from the mathematical formalisms used in Quantum (Quantum Mechanics). We will look at the basic wave equation of Quantum Mechanics (Schrödinger Image).
ih?/?t(?)= ??
Where we have the partial derivative after time of the state function of the system (?) and the Hamiltonian of the system (H). We also have, very importantly, in this equation, a non-rational, imaginary number (i). So, objectively, we must conclude that this equation and the solutions, which also have a complex dimension, are not from the Measurable Level, commonly available to us? Someone will say, and this is, after all, just an equation, how many formulas we have in physics that contain complex numbers and they do not, after all, define any second level, it is all a matter of interpretation. One could make the matter so shallow and go into denial (according to Physicalism), but after all, the solutions to this equation are composite wave functions, which are also represented by composite numbers. That is, they cannot be measurable at our Measurable Level. And this equation and these functions, its solutions, describe the physics of as real a physical system as possible. The only and seemingly logically consistent interpretation of this fact is that there must be a second level, the Non-Measurable Level, and this equation and its solutions represent physics from the point of view of this level.
However, let's take a look at how modern Science, the one that accepts as scientific fact only what can be measured (Physicalism), the atheistic one, the one thoroughly attached, however, to the mechanistic, Deterministic vision of Nature, interprets the phenomena of Quantumness. In general, as for the mathematical formalisms of Quantum, no one discusses them. They are reasonably simple and transparent. Various technologies of modern times have developed on this basis. Today, after nearly a century, transistors, lasers, complex electronics were invented on the basis of the mathematical formalisms of Quantumness. Processors, computers and everything related to modern technology and its practical application. The problems begin when it comes to metaphysical conclusions. And here, to this day, Science has had its own problems. Science does not want to allow at all costs the possibility of the existence of the other, the Unmeasurable Level. And hence there are only single-level Interpretations of Quantum, which all but one, about which in a moment, lead to logical inconsistencies, contradictions, at best to unexplained paradoxes or contradictions of logical laws. So, in fact, all of them can and must be rejected, according to the generalized proof of Not Straight. Because if something leads to an absurdity, it is a falsehood (proof of Not Straightforward). However, this does not mean that Quantum is itself false. It only means that all interpretations of this Quantum, except for one interpretation by Everett, are certainly false, because they lead to outright absurdities (Reductio ad absurdum). But Everett's Interpretation is also, in my opinion, false, just from a different point of view. However, because of the fact that it is not falsified due to proof not directly (Reductio ad absurdum), most modern atheistic physicists have recognized it as the one correct one. Why is it not falsified? Because de facto she is not one-level but infinitely many-level. It assumes the absurd vision of budding the world into infinitely many disconnected worlds. Why, then, do I believe that she too is false? Because there is another simple and non-contradictory solution. This plus Ockham's razor allows me to effectively reject this last resort for atheists of all sorts. This interpretation, which is the only one that does not lead to absurdities and contradictions, is the Interpretation of the Two Levels of Quantum. This is not an interpretation that divides physics into macro and micro worlds. It is an interpretation that assumes the existence of two levels of the world. The Measurable Level, Hard Matter, and the second level, the Unmeasurable Level, that is, the one that does not yield to the senses, to measurement. I will write about this in detail in a moment. But now I will turn to the contradictions and absurdities that all single-level interpretations carry, that is, those that do not recognize processes and phenomena that do not yield to measurement and observation. It is interesting to note that at the dawn of the emergence of Quantum, it would not even have occurred to theoretical physicists of the likes of Dirac, Schrödinger, Heisenberg or even Einstein that tangible reality is not the only and only acceptable one. It was, and still is, the aftermath of the Copernican Revolution, which knocked God and the Spiritual off the pedestal of Science. It was this legacy of the Enlightenment, it was this tradition and trust in the fact that man is the measure of all things and there is only what he experiences. The Enlightenment era, indeed with its victory of Determinism, Mechanisms, seemed to affirm this human self-reliance and self-sufficiency. But we today, with the benefit of hindsight, can confidently state that this was only an illusion. It is already so difficult for scientists to conclude that quantum's implies the triumph of Indeterminism over Determinism (from the point of view of the Measurable Level), for this reason physics seems illogical and incomprehensible to them. Unfortunately, all single-level and atheistic interpretations like the Copenhagen Interpretation and its many clones only add to this confusion. So what is the trouble with all one-level interpretations, whatever they may be?
First of all, on the fact that they try, all these one-level interpretations - actually, there is no other way - to fit (fit) all these concepts, ideas of Quantum, these combined ideas, with concepts and quantities of Real nature on the same, one level, on the Level of observable reality, because, after all, there is no other. And this leads in a simple way to paradoxes, contradictions and contradictions of the elementary laws of logic. Therefore, the basic problem in these interpretations (e.g., the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum) is, among other things, the Problem of Measurement. How here from the form of a composite function representing the state of the system to transform seamlessly into the real value of the measured parameter? Hence were born such monstrosities of ideas as State Function Reduction (Quantum Collapse). How many scientific wonks have been created to justify the reality of such an approach.
In general, how many studies by natural philosophers have been written, and probably will be written still, to explain in some meaningful way the subtle differences between the various interpretations of Quantum (the one-level ones). Sometimes the thing breaks down to one word, one concept, one reference, and there is so much smoke that no one really understands it. I, here, have to honestly admit most of the interpretations of Quantum are incomprehensible to me because of over-stretched arguments. Copenhagen Interpretation, Relational Interpretation, Transactional Interpretation, Consistent Histories Interpretation, Riegl's Interpretation and a multitude of others. I, God forbid, do not question the competence of the authors, the physicists who proposed these interpretations, but I must say here that they are terribly vague and only deter amateurs in general from trying to learn about Quantum. And it all boils down to this confusion at one (accessible level, after all) of concepts and composite quantities with measurable concepts. As I write the further content of this book, we will look at all these problems of single-level interpretations more closely.
Now I'll just note that the Complex Numbers, generally the Body of Complex Numbers, were discovered much earlier than Quantum Mechanics. And it was at least several centuries earlier. And the fact that their proper functioning used to be related to the Non-Measurable Level, as it should be according to the Pythagorean Principle, of which I am a fervent advocate, was not immediately realized at the time of their discovery, and in fact there is quite a bit of trouble about it to this day. By whom? By the "great ones," those who created Science and its Paradigms. All this has caused an impossible confusion. Professional mathematicians "suffer" from a strange affliction that manifests itself in the fact that they often forget that mathematics is the language of physics, and it is through it (mathematics) that we learn how the world (physics) works. Mathematicians would like their domain to be some abstract, detached branch of Science. However, it has been known since antiquity that mathematics always has concrete applications, and as Rutherford said ...only physics counts, the rest is philately...Indeed, everything real comes down to physics. Originally, after all, the basics of arithmetic were developed as far back as Sumer just so that the rams in the herd could be counted. Physical mathematicians or, in other words, mathematical physicists are sacredly convinced of the existence of a Platonic world, that is, a place where mathematical ideals ontologically exist. And so, the idea of a circle, although realistically we will never achieve it in practice, we will not plot a perfect circle with a circular wheel, it exists, this idea, in the world of Platonic Ideas. Therefore, many would be inclined to consider that composite numbers function in such a Platonic world. And in this context, they would probably recognize that the Unmeasurable Level may exist in the Platonic world. I, for one, believe that one should go a step further, to follow the path of the Pythagorean Principle, which assumes that every true mathematical fact has its counterpart in the real world, in physics. And that's why I think all single-level interpretations of Quantum are inaccurate, to say the least, and there are actually two levels. The Measurable Level and the generalized Unmeasurable Level. And I believe that this Non-Measurable Level exists realistically, although it does not yield to observation, as I will prove later in still this book.
As I wrote, all single-level interpretations of quantum's generate logical problems and paradoxes themselves. Paradoxes, that is, something that is accepted as true, although it contradicts logic. But, as is well known, anything that leads to the contradiction of logic is the canvass of the proof of Not Straight. So paradoxes may be accepted in the humanities, but not in physics. Even those so-called paradoxes in STW turn out, on deeper consideration, to be only pseudo-paradoxes and are explained correctly by classical logic. However, if popular interpretations of quantum's lead the straight path to paradoxes, this is proof of their incorrectness. I know of only two interpretations that are devoid of these logical flaws. These are: Everett's Interpretation and the Two Levels Interpretation, the one I present in this book. What should be emphasized here, however, all of them, the correct and the false interpretations, are based on the same mathematical formalism. But this further obscures the whole problem, because even though we interpret quantum's falsely, it is difficult to falsify it. However, there are always a few elements that point the right way. This additional element is the correct form of the Law of Causality, or the Law of Cause and Effect. That is, it can be said that the ontological sense of the composite formalism and the correct form of Causality, and the Pythagorean principle, as well as the reliance on the laws of Classical Logic, fully confirm the truth and validity of the Interpretation of the Two Levels of Quantum.
